Description
Upgrade your firearm setup with this high-performance combo package, featuring the Rock Island VRF-14 semi-automatic firearm, an SB Tactical SBA3 pistol brace, and premium NCSTAR tactical accessories. This kit is designed for shooters looking for enhanced control, stability, and customization in a compact, powerful platform. All-in-One Tactical Setup with Rail-Ready Customization. Upgrade your firepower today with this ultimate tactical package!
*SBA3 BRACE, TELESTOCK, AND FOLDING ADAPTER SHIP UNASSEMBLED*
Included Components:
Rock Island VRF-14 Semi-Auto Firearm
Stock/Grip: Textured Polymer for Superior Control
Features: Picatinny Rail for Optics & Accessories, Forward Grip for Enhanced Handling
Action: Semi-Automatic Gas-Operated
SB Tactical SBA3 Pistol Brace
5-Position Adjustable Design – Customizable for Maximum Comfort
Mil-Spec Carbine Receiver Extension Compatibility – Fits Standard Carbine Buffer Tubes
Integrated Ambidextrous QD Sling Attachment – Quick & Easy Sling Integration
NCSTAR Grip Adapter Telestock Tube
Ergonomic Polymer Design – Improves Stability and Control
Quick & Secure Mounting
NCSTAR Folding Grip Adapter
Made of quality reinforced polymer composite
Durable Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer Composite Construction
Shop with KYGUNCO for the best selection, competitive pricing, and exceptional customer service. Experience the difference that comes with buying from a trusted outdoor retailer with over 20 years of experience in the industry.
Firearms Specifications:
Manufacturer: Rock Island
Model: VRF-14
Barrel Length: 14"
Caliber: 12 Gauge
Action: Semi-Auto
Capacity: 5 Rd.
SKU: 284025
MPN: VRF-14-COMBO
Live Inventory Search
Compare prices for VRF-14-COMBO - Rock Island VRF-14 Combo 12 Gauge 14" 5rd - Black w/ SBA3 Brace, Telestock, & Folding Adapter from all vendors
| Store | Price | Shipping rate | Report | Show more |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Out Of Stock
|
||||
|
$599.99
|
Most Firearms ship for FREE |
Wikiarms.com Live Prices
| Product | Store | Price | PPR |
|---|
Powered by Wikiarms.com
Comments (22)
LOL, is robbins290 seriously upvoting all "its" own comments? (with 4wabberty doing so within seconds as well). Wow.....no wonder they seek attention so desperately.
I'm going to be nicer to those 'two' completely different users moving forward...clearly they require extra attention ;)
You mentioned me in your drivel 2 hours ago BooHoo. Did you think I wouldn't take advantage of that stupidity? Is your uncle not at home, is that why you "seek attention so desperately."
robins290 has been here for over 7 years. You see any thinking adult would know that your multiple accounts that registered the day before their only post that gives you a thumbs up or agrees with your BS is a completely different situation. Don't worry I only explained it to show you have no credibility to the few that don't follow your lies, the rest already knew this.
Clearly articulating a reply was too difficult for you two. Can't keep up with this "thing" can ya? LOL, and still no case rulings? No surprise there. Sad, even two of you together cannot keep up with this "it."
Still waiting for the partners in crimes against nature to prove pistol grip shotgun (not classified as a "firearm) = pIsToL.
P.S. Amazing how well these two completely different user profile's timestamps line up to one another. Nothing strange about multiple "replies" back to back to back posted just minutes apart (wink wink).
Clearly showing how stupid you are isn't difficult, but very easy. You should know by now that most people on here think you're nothing but a dumbass libtard. I'm sure makd is on the list now.
Just to share my personal experience, ATF denied my mossberg shockwave during brace amnesty period. The shogun had pistol grip with brace on it… and recommend or demand regular $200 tax stamp.
That's a bummer but but frankly isn't a surprise. The brace rules were pretty clear to only apply to pistols / rifles (non smoothbores) that would become "short barrelled rifles" if the pistol brace rule was vacated. No pistol brace classification = short barrel rifle...just like before the ATF basically invented the concept of AR "pistol." A short barrelled shotgun or "firearm" (as classified here) could never be construed as a "rifle" or "pistol" as their legal description excludes shotguns by very definition....this was true before the "pistol brace" was invented in 2012 and is still true today.
If that wasn't the case a Mossberg 500 Persuader (with a pistol grip only) could be cut down to any barrel length as it would be a "pistol." Of course we know that isn't the case....that is a federal crime without the proper tax stamp. Silly I know, but I don't make the rules ;)
For example, not a "pistol":
"https://gun.deals/search/apachesolr_search/015813501385"
FYI, any rants from Airsoft Timmy aka 4wabberty will be ignored. Unless she wants to link to some of those many "court rulings" that she declares settled things but cannot cite to save her life ;)
Look at fake soldier boy struggle with his drivel again. He just told you his mossberg shockwave was denied amnesty saying the law didn't exclude shotguns. Like I said before they are going to determine that when the have reason to come to your house for the investigation. You know...like when they show up to your tent for vandalizing Tesla's.
I didn't say anything about court rulings you pathetic liar, show me where I said that. Just more of your stupid drama trying to prove a point that you can't make again.
"Notably, the final rule does not address brace-equipped, smoothbore pistol grip firearms."
Whats that “thing” rambling about this time?
I you want the facts: https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/factoring-criteria-firearms-attached-stabilizing-braces...
This was June 2023. You all know who was president at the time, or I would hope so. Elections have consequences
https://apnews.com/article/pistol-braces-gun-control-biden-rules-shootings-cb82dd071f47413e5c55ab36d4c9a5a7...
The ATF pistol brace ban was overturned in a lawsuit by the US District Court in Texas. Under the Mock v. Garland pistol brace update court ruling, pistol braces are legal for now across the nation.
If this gun does not come under the pistol brace laws then why worry about it coming "UNASSEMBLED" and being subject to prosecution if you assemble it? Because the anti gun crowd leaves the laws in a gray area to be determined by them after you're arrested .As you can see there is a difference between a pistol and a pistol brace, which the subject being discussed.
That ATF link (and pistol braces in general) only covers firearms with "rifled barrels." Check your own link, you just disproved yourself! Does this shotgun have a rifled barrel? Do you know what a rifled barrel even is?
Clearly you don't want to discuss fAcTs and thanks for not pointing to any court rulings....because they didn't exist. And are we really sure we want to be blaming the current president for the state of affairs under him? That might not be a game you want to play. See the economy (now or then) or all the anti gun stuff that occurred under ya boi..and by him the first go round. Oops!
BTW, "firearms" (as a classification) are still not "pistols" no matter how many times you confuse things with pistol grips. Perhaps that "dido" of yours is also a pistol because you can cup the two balls while bracing the otherside in your mouth ;)
*Really sad airsoft Timmy hasn't learned anything new about guns. No wonder his "wife" Jocasta "shoots better than him." I'll give him the power of the last word, clearly Oedipus, err Timmy needs it.
"Notably, the final rule does not address brace-equipped, smoothbore pistol grip firearms." Do you even know what this means fake soldier boy? When looking at this gun do you see a pistol or a pistol brace? You don't know the difference do you? How could the courts rule on somethin that hasn't been addressed drama queen? You're the one who mention "UNASSEMBLED" and are worried about this shipping method, but don't let your previous posts and contradictions get in the way of your normal drivel.
Republicans stopped the ant-gun demorats again but you don't like the fAcTs do you? Trump wasn't president in 2023, are you confused about your 3 day 'timezones" again? I posted a link to the CoUrT rUlinG but I know you don't click on anything that doesn't mention man balls and mouth, so I'm not surprised you missed it.
If you had a wife instead of a boyfriend I'm sure she would out shoot you with subcompact pistol but we will never know for sure.
Fun reading: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/IF12364.pdf...
"Notably, the final rule does not address brace-equipped, smoothbore pistol grip firearms, though the text preceding
the actual rule has led some readers to question whether such firearms should be submitted for re-classification.
However, ATF has stated that this is not so."
The above is the last official "interpretation" I've (or anyone else) has seen to my knowledge, I'm actually interested though, what courts have ruled that smoothbored "firearms" can have pistol braces without being (legally) NFA controlled items? I'd love to be corrected here with specific cases and rulings.
Also, shotguns aren't "pistol"....by a "legal definition" just because they lack a stock. Especially short barreled. If they were, we wouldn't need the classification at all of "firearm" once you removed the stock (or never attached one) as they'd already be a "pistol" and relatively unregulated (as guns go). A pistol's "legal definition" is classified by more than just one handed shooting....that is why gray areas and other classifications exist such as AOW's and "firearms." Otherwise every single Mossberg 500 with a pistol grip only would be a "pistol"...by "legal definition." Yet we know that ain't the case.
BTW, Biden created the NFA? Last I checked the NFA was circa 1934, old Joe might have been in high school at that point however he wasn't passing any legislation ;)
Well.. i believe its classified as a PGOF(Pistol grip only firearm).
As it was classified this way , by putting a brace or stock may be stepping on the grey line.
For what it's worth... I have both the vrf14 equipped with the folder/sb brace, and also a vr70 as well. With the vrf14 Extended, the 2 are almost identical overall length.
Shooting it without a brace or stock for even a few rounds will leave you hurting and confused as to why pgof!
Likely the constant changing regs so they didn't even bother and left it up to us to work the grey lines...
"SBA3 BRACE, TELESTOCK, AND FOLDING ADAPTER SHIP UNASSEMBLED"
Probably because you are (most likely) violating federal law once you assemble it. FWIW; pistol braces are for "pistols," which sub 18" shotguns aren't classified as therefore aren't magically covered under their provision of use.
Will you have problems with the ATF...probably not. Is it worth the risk regardless...probably not.
It’s classified as a firearm and not a shotgun.
Yep, courts have upheld that pistol braces are legal when used on "firearms" meeting the legal definition of a pistol, provided they aren’t modified to function as short-barreled rifles.
Pistol – designed to be held in one hand, short stock below line of bore, chamber integral with the barrel, double or single action, semi-automatic or single shot.
You can thank Biden for this mess.
Exactly, so the "pistol" brace decisions do not apply here. It isn't a rifle, it isn't a pistol, and the ATF certainly has not classified braces to apply to "firearms," shotguns, or AOW for that matter.
Again, there is a reason the retailer is shipping as an "UNASSEMBLED" aka a B.Y.O.F.O. (Bring Your Own Federal Offense) kit ;)
Like I alluded to before, most likely no one would ever be charged with with a crime for using this with a brace but if I am going to risk a federal offense it ain't going to be for a $250 range toy* shotgun. Risk vs reward. The reward just ain't here for me, perhaps you feel different.
*Not knocking the VRF-14, I just wouldn't consider this a serious use firearm in any configuration.
.