- You must login before you can vote.
- You must login before you can vote.
Description
SKU 47110624B
Brand Palmetto State Armory
DETAILS
Finish: Black, Hardcoat Anodized
Caliber: Multi
California Buyers - stripped lowers are sent to California as "Long Guns" only.
Please make sure the business name of the FFL you will be using is on your order.
FEATURES
The "TRUMP-47” lower comes from the most advanced aerospace manufacturing technology and is one of the industry’s finest forged, MIL-SPEC lowers. This PSA lower is made using our automated manufacturing process. Our multi-million dollar engineering and manufacturing facilities allow us to produce a product of unequaled quality and value.
These forged lowers are quality made, MIL-SPEC designed and use 7075-T6 Aluminum. The Palmetto State Armory "TRUMP-47" Lower will accommodate all AR-15 platform builds and is marked "TRUMP-47". The finish is MIL-A-8625, Type III, Class 2 black.
* These lowers will have cosmetic blemishes that do not affect function. This may include, but is not limited to, forging marks under the finish, scratches, slight variation in the finish color coat.*
Coupons for Palmetto State Armory store
Comments (29)
Screw it, in for 4. Will be great Christmas presents this year.
I wonder why these gun companies decided NOT to put any reference to a gun grabbing democrat on their products??
You mean the one who was a democrat til they wouldn't nominate him in 2016, then promoted taking guns without due process? He's on this one.
Seems fitting, a blem receiver and a blem president........
You said buying stuff with people on it. Most sports are nothing but political crap anymore.
When will people learn that he’s not a pro-2A guy? Better than Kamala? Yes. But we had other choices for president. Stupid two-party system…
Who? What "other" choice did we have for President? Tell us which choice that wasn't a part of the bush RINO cabal that has spent the last 5 decades LYING to us to get elected. How many of those same RINO's backed the red flag laws?
Chase Oliver was another choice, and frankly one who would have better squared with both the left and the right. We, the collective People, have allowed a two-party system to dictate our politics for too long. The reason we continue to have a two-party system is because the People don’t have the balls to stand up and say “ENOUGH!” and actually use their vote for a change.
Why would all the major gun groups support Trump if he wasn't a pro-2A guy?
Because they’re caught in the same trapped idea that we only have two choices of party for a path to victory. Other parties are out of play as long as we all decide they’re out of play and continue to vote red vs blue.
They can't even gain enough support to make the primary, who's fault is that. Voting for someone who gets 2% of the vote is a waste of time and allows anti gun demorats another win.
And this is why we have a two party system.
Is the blem that Trump is obese and this caricature showns a thin person?
You're suggesting that part of the republican base would have supported a different person. No. The majority is clearly in a cult of Trump. Even your point is just more confirmation to them that everyone is out against their great person. That's a cult.
Also, buying stuff with people on it...kinda pretty much the definition of a cult.
I’m not suggesting that anyone in the Republican Party would have supported anyone other than Trump, though I can see why you might interpret my words that way.
I’m disappointed and disillusioned by the fact that we have allowed our government to dictate the choice between two parties and candidates that are “acceptable” to the current order. I voted for Chase Oliver in this last election - Jo Jorgensen before that. Instead of voting for whoever has “the best chance of winning,” as I’ve been told by countless libertarian friends who vote Red, I voted for who actually wants 75%+ what I want: smaller federal government, balanced budget, less involvement in other countries’ problems, a secure border, freedom to do and be who we want to be.
Everyone IS out to get our "great person." How many lawfare cases? how many assassination attempts? It's obvious you're a douchecRAT, please tell us who your 2A savior is. I don't recall any RINO's or democRATS getting banned off social media either. Who is your choice?
So if you buy a t-shirt with your favorite athlete on it you're in a cult?
If you can't distinguish politics and sports being fundamentally from different universes...yeah. That's a cult.
Exactly, one is the responsible governing for a country and it's ENTIRE population and the other is a ghetto moron that can bounce a ball. Ya, it's us that's in the cult. I bet you wear your trans, pronoun, che, blue dyed hair with "pride" too.
You said buying stuff with people on it is a cult. Most sports are nothing but political crap anymore.
The perfect response in the world required for Trump. Everything is bad. Everything. Everything...but my guy.
What is required by Trump? Maybe common sense, public decency, some honesty? Obviously Trump was the better choice, just because you don't like it doesn't make it true.
Says the guy from the party that labels everyone that disagrees with them hitler.
Musk interviewed the current Nazi party leader in Germany a week ago.
Google "Musk AfD" and enjoy.
I see what I think you’re trying to say, and I’ll listen to the interview of Musk with Alice Weidel later tonight to understand the reference you’re trying to vaguely make.
From what I read of her political positions on Wikipedia, I don’t see how those positions could be even remotely aligned to what the Neo-Nazi party believes.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Weidel...
So there are two strong possibilities here:
1. You’re simply repeating what you hear from others without doing any research for yourself, in which case - don’t be a sheep.
2. You’re actively and purposefully spreading false information with malicious intent.
I’ll listen to the interview and I would encourage others to do their own research. Maybe I’ll hear something there that aligns and supports what you’re saying. But I’m very doubtful of that right now.
I’ll edit this later after I review the interview.
EDIT: I see nothing in that interview that indicates alignment to Nazi-ism from either party. What I do see is the attempt at a logical conversation, talking about valid concerns and problems that Germany (and, to some extent, the USA) are trying to work through. That said, I did not get any meaningful impression that either of them actually knows what to do, knows all the facts, and is capable of making the hard decisions necessary for that level of leadership.
Finally, did you even listen to the interview? Or did you get your feelings about the fact that an interview between these two people took place from other people? Because I cannot see at all where you would interpret anything readily available - other than political “journalism” that has a known agenda - to point out alignment of the AfD to Nazi purpose.
No offense to you, but you just said you don't know what AfD is (her party).
The German constitution allows the government to investigate Nazi like parties. If you google AfD as of today (5/16) Germany just allowed AfD to secretly monitored by its anti terrorism law enforcement agency set up for this exact action of investigating Nazi members.
You admitted you didn't know. Don't came in talking expert. Not being mean. Stating it from your own words of lack of knowledge. Then don't speak as authority. Learn from those who know.
Why do you think Tesla is tanking in Europe? So many clues to be NOT on the side your defending.
Another article today is calling Musk Trump's useful now useless idiot. Trump sure surrounds himself with dumb people...
I don't see anywhere in my post where I propose to be an expert - nor where I even implied it. If anything, I've specified that I would do additional research based on the positions you asserted and then evaluate the facts.
I also don't see anything in any of your post history that indicates credentialing proving that you are an expert in politics, let alone German politics. Perhaps you live there?
We are both grasping at straws with this topic and doing our best to understand the information made available to us through admittedly biased individuals and groups that have specific agendas to control our perspective of said information. If you don't understand that by now, then our discussion is a moot point and waste of time for both of us.
Your additional points are all made as if they exist in a vacuum and you "obviously" know and understand something that the rest of humanity doesn't.
a. Yes, the German constitution blah blah blah. We are speaking of politics here. Every move has a purpose and agenda. If AfD is a very large threat to the existing political environment - which is very heavily left leaning - then those political groups will use every tool to their advantage to create perceptions that are to their advantage or root out dirty information that they can leverage.
b. Tesla is tanking in Europe for a number of reasons. Not just because Elon interviewed the AfD party leader.
c. Just because a news article - no citation of said article was offered by you - calls Musk Trump's useful now useless idiot does not indicate it's truth.
It's very obvious to me that you acquire the majority of your information from the left-leaning agenda, which shapes your perspective of said events. I also read from the left, but include the right and the middle. I evaluate the information offered from all sides, attempt to discern the facts, and then decide for myself what the probable facts mean. I suggest you do the same. I can say with 100% confidence that to do otherwise is allowing yourself to believe lies and fall into the trap others set for you.
All these a$$holes here on this gun site that are anti-TRUMP (President just secured a TRILLION + $$$$$$ deal with Saudi Arabia) for America,,,,,would still bellyache, moan & groin, and bitch even if He eliminated the $37 TRILLION DOLLARS DEBT that America has.