Description
WarrHogg Black 80% Lower Receiver & Jig KitThis 308 / AR10 80% lower receiver and jig system called the WarrHogg from Polymer 80 is the result of two years of design, planning, meticulous engineering and rigorous testing. As the industry's first reinforced polymer receiver designed for a DPMS-styled .308 in an 80 percent format, it features a reinforced design that has a solid core. This WarrHogg features an improved buffer tube ring and ribbing across the entire upper surface area and a no-thread design on the pistol grip. Its stiffened magwell design is incredibly lightweight, making it a favorite for varmint or hunting rifles. It is injection-molded from an automated system, which assures every receiver is perfectly machined every time.This kit's lower features include:1x W308 lower receiver1x 3/8" pistol grip nut1x 1.5" pistol grip screwThis kit's jig features include:1x WarrHogg J100 .308 jig1x 7/16" end-mill bit with laser-etched dept mark1x 3/8" safety selector switch hole drill bit1x 5/32" pin hole drill bit for triggers and hammers1x 5/16" trigger hole drill bit1x TG100 trigger guidePlease note: Some states may not allow you to legally manufacture a firearm without a serial number (like the state of NJ and Washington DC). Please be sure to do your due diligence and make sure you are following your state and local laws before attempting to manufacture a firearm. This is not intended and should not be construed as an advertisement or offer for sale of any of our products to New Jersey or Washington DC residents or any person in New Jersey or Washington DC.
MPN#: P80-308KITP80-308KIT-BLACK
Coupons for Right To Bear store
Comments (20)
I don’t think I would give it a go but for those who do wish ya the best with it.
So Im ok with a polymer lower say on an AR style .22 lower and am a little sketchy about a polymer .223 lower, BUT no way in hell would I trust or build a .308 lower made of polymer! The pressures in a .308 vs. a .223 are immense. This polymer on firearms is getting a bit dangerous and out of control in my opinion. I dont see the point in trying to make a .308 AR Lower out of tupperware. Its easy to see these manufacturers dont fully trust polymer either as they are constantly changing these and adding "reinforcements" made of steel and or aluminum. That right there says alot. I would not risk having a polymer rifle come apart in ones face or it failing when a life is on the line.
You certainly are entitled to your own opinion and I will respect that, I ask you do the same. If youd like to have a discussion and respectful debate Im ok with that too.
Polymer lowers on a .308 is fine. All the "pressure" is between the barrel and bolt carrier group. That's why you don't see Polymer Uppers much lol. The lower only really houses the trigger and keeps magazine in line.
I'm sure it's fine or we would hear all kinds of failures on the web and YouTube videos.
Not entirely true sniper. The buffer and spring are going to be receiving the momentum from the BCG. This means the weak point is likely the threading for the buffer tube. A good test would be shooting over gassed 308’s and see how long it lasts
Remember the bolt carrier slams into the hammer at about 9 million mph so the hammer pin receives a severe blow with every shot and I would expect the hammer and trigger pin holes to elongate or crack out.
Plastic = junk.
Back in my day the “J-word” meant something different. Glad times have changed
But you're okay with that polymer lower on 40 caliber Glock?
40 short and weak doesn't exactly have the same punch as a 308.
You don't see any 44mag poly frames, hell the Tanfoglio 10mm poly frame is terrible about breaking and there are plenty of reviews that back that up.
A 40 might as well be a popgun in comparison to a real caliber. There's a reason CZ steel frames are the de-facto standard in competition.
Polymer .308? Yeah, no thanks. We aren't talking handgun frames here.
There's a reason the government issues them in 7075.
Then to add insult to injury its 80%...
SHEEEIIIT.
I'd like to ask a sincere question. Why would someone be a fan of 80% lowers? It's only purpose seems to circumvent the (very easy) path to legal and proud gun ownership. If you want to illegally obtain an AR, this seems like the only reasonable way to go...so why are we so proud to sell these?
Another answer is that there are legal firearm owners who can't pass the background check. They're not felons or mentally deficient, but due to a glitch in the system or something that happened decades ago that should no longer be relevant, they simple can't pass it and they have to go through the court system to get it fixed. Till then, there's 80 percents.
80%s are a great way for law abiding citizens to be able to arm themselves when the system fails.
The common realistic answer is people like to build, "the AR15: Legos for men". After the first couple off the shelf receiver builds I started asking, "Well what else can I do?" Down the rabbit hole I go; 80%'s, cerakoting, multi caliber, anodizing, and now 80 glocks. Honestly if I had a better mill set up I'd want to try a 0%, but that'd be way down the road. Slapping together an AR is well and all, but there is another level of accomplishment felt after a raw 80 build. Regarding what gessed said, no, no it is not cheaper.
As far as the "illegal" part goes, most criminal morons don't have the patience to build an AR let alone an 80. Glock, maybe, but there is a way more effort on the machining skills end of things and we're talking about people that can't read on a 3rd grade level. It would be way easier for them to go though their criminal bros to get one or just do private transaction.
To address Janizary, while I hope to never see the US fall into such a state of fascism in my lifetime; a gun that doesn't exist, has no reasonable suspicion to be confiscated. Hopefully that's just mild paranoia, but with what the 2020 Dim primary contenders are spouting I don't count out a resurrection of the AWB.
It's cheaper. Welcome to gun.deals, the gun website for saving money.
So this is the same as the lr.308? My gen 2 80% lower jig is compatible with this lower?
Doubtful. If you look at the pic of the lower, there are some pointless stylistic elements to it that appear (to me) to exist solely for making the included jig useless for anything but another one of the same plastic lowers [which doesn't need one, since it will come with another single-use jig of its own.] I could be wrong, but that's how things look from where I'm sitting.
Not to step on anyone's dick but I'm 99% positive that Tennessee Arms Company was the first. It's been at least 2.5 years since I bought one from them.
Woohoo4u what do you mean the “ J-word “ ??