Description

This Complete Palmetto State Armory Pistol lower is fully assembled and ready for your Pistol Upper!
Machined from Aluminum Forgings 7075-T6
Hardcoat Anodizing: MIL-A-8625F, Type III, Class 2
7075 Receiver Extension
PSA Grip in Black
Standard Carbine Buffer
Un-notched Hammer compatible with 9mm use
Caliber: Multi
This item contains parts that are not California compliant and as such may be illegal to import into the state of California. We comply with all local, state, and federal laws. Please be aware of your state and local laws before ordering.
SKU: 42838

Find more Lowers Palmetto State Armory for sale gun parts.

Coupons for Palmetto State Armory store

SB3X
Expiration date Unknown Report
SB4X
Expiration date Unknown Report
SB5X
Expiration date Unknown Report

Live Inventory Search

Want to see your products here? Click this link.

Compare prices for 42838 - PSA AR-15 Complete Classic Pistol Lower - No Magazine, Black - 42838 000000042838 from all vendors

Store Price Shipping rate Report Show more
$119.99
$18 Firearms

Comments (60)

Login or register to post comments

And what cal. Can I build from this?

0 votes
0 votes

Lower is marked "multi" meaning it can accept magazines for 5.56/.223, 7.62x39, and since .300 blackout uses the same mags as 5.56 you can run that too. Just make sure to get the correct barrel for the caliber; sounds dumb, but it's always better to be safe than sorry.

0 votes
0 votes

I've used this for 556 and 762x39

0 votes
0 votes

I’m new to building from scratch but there’s allot of hype about this piece.
Question: what do I need to complete this and if you can add some links, because of my income I will need to buy check by check maybe $100 to$150 limit. Please advise

0 votes
0 votes

Hey thanks guys for info if you could do you have some links

0 votes
0 votes

Buy this and it shouldn't exceed $150 with dealers fee.

Then you need a complete upper, or piece together the bolt carrier group, barreled upper (140-300). You can get tools to build the whole upper yourself but that does get pricey. I've used them for two already and will have probably one a year til I'm saturated so it was worth it to me.
Beyond that, mags, ammo, oh and probably some sort of brace right?

0 votes
0 votes

Got mine in time for Christmas! The price is too good, the quality is above standard. This lower is well made and smooth. The trigger is crisp and clean.

0 votes
0 votes

FYI $9 shipping

0 votes
0 votes

ur the hero we don’t deserve

0 votes
0 votes

Whaaa there back in stock wooooo!!!

0 votes
0 votes

$108.99 shipped for me. It’s nice to see shipping is $9 instead of $17

0 votes
0 votes

Can't believe how cheap this is! I've always paid $129.99 for these and never thought that they would ever go this low. And not even blemished!

1 vote
0 votes
Edit - Nevermind, out of stock. Karri's Guns had a complete pistol lower for 99.99 + 9.99 shipping, but I have no experience with it. https://gun.deals/product/kg-ar15-complete-carbine-or-pistol-7075-t6-lower-sale-9999
0 votes
0 votes

Is this full semi auto? asking for a friend

2 votes
0 votes

Making silly jokes and blaming a friend for it. Kids these days, they do the strangest things for fun :P

0 votes
0 votes

Full auto. You won't be disappointed. Point and shoot. No aiming required. Caseless rounds. USB 4 port.

3 votes
0 votes

Im not sure how this was updated an hour ago, according to the top line on the post. Cause all the stuff to build one for this price is out of stock and has been for 2 days. Looks like adrian must work for psa. So im calling bull sh**

0 votes
0 votes

Sorry, might be me in the diatribe in the comments section on why the atf sux that's getting the repost's ;)

1 vote
0 votes

I cant speak for this exact rifle but i own a couple ar platforms a smith and wesson and recently purchased a psa rifle. For the price they are top notch great rifles and shooters. I have nothing but good things to say when the topic is PSA if this rifle is anything like thier freedom line. Expect a nice rifle for a great price

1 vote
0 votes

Is this a uzi?

0 votes
0 votes

Haha oops typo

0 votes
0 votes

That shipping and handling tho :\

0 votes
0 votes

Is this fully automatic? Or semi automatic? I'm a begginer so I dont really know. Still learning here

0 votes
2 votes

@ATFDickRider

2 votes
0 votes

You're not going to find a full auto under 10 grand and at least 6 month waiting period thanks to the atf

2 votes
0 votes

Semi

0 votes
0 votes

You are 100% correct. Just as bad as the FCC & IRS. Might as well throw the FBI & ATF in the pile. All are as crooked as a mountain pass. Hopefully Trump will straighten out the FBI.

1 vote
0 votes

Template for WooHooFuckU-Why are you replying to my post WooHooFuckU? You know I don't read the runny dog shit that comes out of your mouth. When I want to talk to you, I will reply to one of your posts. Until then, STFU Twinkie.

0 votes
0 votes

The ATF is the enforcement agency. That's like blaming police for the speed limit or a building inspector for ADA laws.

0 votes
2 votes

I call bs. While the mfg an import of fully auto firearms is mandated by federal law, the atf is notoriously slow to act on tax stamp transfers, despite having a penchant for hassling law abiding businesses on the regular.

And they make thier own rules as they like, without oversite, take pistol braces as an example.

3 votes
1 vote

Let me know the last law the ATF passed. You can "call bs" to gravity but your feet are still stuck to the earth. Slow processing times were blamed on Obama but now what's the excuse? You are confusing the interpretation of the law and the actual law itself: is a pistol "brace" a "stock" when used as one? That is their job to decide. Just like a police officer decides when a hammer is used to bash someone's brains, then magically that hammer becomes a "weapon." The police officer didn't write the law but without his or her judgement that law is completely unenforceable. I bet you're one of those 'we're a nation of laws' pansies who think the rule of law is great...from a distance.

0 votes
1 vote

The atf's "interpretation" is considered the law, and is done with little judicial oversite, that is the problem. For better or worse; 80%, braces, echos, bump stocks, rubber bands, ect; are at their discretion with minimal accountability.

3 votes
0 votes

And a police officer's "interpretation" is considered law when probable cause, erratic driving, or anything not black and white comes to play.

Welcome the United States and our system of government.

1 vote
0 votes

The differentiation is that the atf's interpretation of the law creates president for future enforcement, changing the fundamental implementation of the law. Therefore, it makes them a branch of the judiciary that should be held to a higher standard of jurisprudence.

A police offer's "interpretation" has never fundamentally shifted a legal status of firearms for a nation. Pansy!

2 votes
0 votes

Huh? A judge's interpretation is used as a legal precedent as a matter of policy. When did you emigrate here?

0 votes
0 votes

a judges yes, but not the police officers , which is the original statement. Your pushing 2 different arguments. Which means you know youre wrong

3 votes
0 votes

When was there a judge's interpretation on pistol braces?

Again, atf implements policy with minimal oversights, that should be a problem for everyone

3 votes
0 votes

The problem is we are a nation of 300 million people therefore voting on every major and minor decision is just not possible. We elect people make the choices for us then they appoint people below them to decide how each decision is implemented. Do you really want you and every other American to be involved and every decision and process the FDA, ATF, FCC, FAA, DEA, etc makes? It's just not realistic. However can you imagine if Congress was the decision maker on issues like this? Even worse.

Our system of government is the worse type of government except all others tried before.

0 votes
0 votes

The real problem is that we have an agency that gets to decide the law based on how they feel that day, rather than using adjudication and historic precedence in the courts.
13 months ago if I put a pistol brace on my forehead I broke the law, 12 months ago if I did the same thing it was legal. Why, cause the atf felt like it. If 13 months ago I took the issue to court the judge, rather than look at previous cases and making a ruling based on intent, would turn to the atf and ask"this illegal bro?". With their knack for vague determinations the atf would respond " is today bro, wasn't a couple years ago, not sure why we changed it. Is there a dog around here I can shoot?"

3 votes
0 votes

You are right that in this case they were wishy-washy but would you rather an agency that never changed its mind for the sake of consistency (especially being the new ruling came out in your favor)? Not sure how the ATF could have ‘look at previous cases and make a ruling based on intent.’ This was a newer product they were weighing on the legality on….heck, the only reason they probably decided it was illegal to shoulder was literally tens of thousands of people contacting the ATF (poking the bear) asking for personized letters stating it was ‘legal to shoulder.’ Imagine if that many people contacted the FDA asking if it was acceptable to smoke aspirin? I bet it would be an Rx item within a few months.

Who should decide these things then? Congress? They can’t figure out healthcare, taxes, etc and they are going to worry about arm braces? The courts? Someone has to get arrested for that to happen…now wait 3 years while that person rots in prison. Then who?

0 votes
0 votes

The atf sets their standards of rigor so low they border on asinine. And no, input from congress in '34, '68, and '86 didn't necessarily help. Considering that a glock with a stick attached is a "rifle", but an ar with a tube is a "pistol" really shows the lack of common sense. Really the whole sbr and silencer tax stamp thing needs an overhaul. The number of these items in public hands has only continued to grow, but their use in crime remains relatively insignificant. But hey, the gov is making money off of it, so it will probably never change.

If the atf's "rationale" for initially looking into braces was based on people asking about it, but no one committing actual crimes with it, they should have taken a pass rather than banning the way that you shoot. That was just laziness on the part of the atf.

I'm going to have to go with the courts being the deciding factor, and that as it should be, the burden of proof is forced upon the state before punishment is implemented. That or another party that actually looks at the current laws, likelihood of abuse, and their constitutional relevance. That probably won't happen since the "pro" that we got from '86 removed research funding for gun crimes, and anti gunners always derail the conversation with emotion anyway.

Yes, the system is probably never going to be perfect, but that is hardly a reason to give the atf a pass.

2 votes
0 votes

You are still blaming the ATF for laws passed by Congress. I'm done.

0 votes
1 vote

You are still giving the atf a pass on stupid decisions. I'll never be done fighting against that. They have more direct control over the specific implementation of the law than congress, without placating to "da constitiants".

4 votes
0 votes

Enjoying both perspectives here. One of the more interesting tit for tats I've read in a while. Sure beats being called a cheap ass...lol

2 votes
0 votes

Fully automatic is illegal, so you can’t get it unless you have a very very special permit.

0 votes
0 votes

Read as: It's very illegal and immoral, until you pay the tax man, then you are free to pillage and plunder with it.

0 votes
0 votes

Semi auto. Select fire or automatic fire is when the firearm discharges multiple rounds with a single trigger pull. Semi automatic requires you pull the trigger for each shot.

0 votes
0 votes

What is the Metallurgy on this unit?

0 votes
0 votes

Why only 3 stars on this?

0 votes
0 votes

Because no one has voted yet.

0 votes
0 votes
Login or register to post comments